RTX

RTX combines aircraft systems, engines and defense equipment through Collins Aerospace, Pratt & Whitney and Raytheon. Its businesses connect new-equipment deliveries with maintenance, modernization and replenishment over long customer relationships. [S1][S67]

RTX Corporation ·NYSE: RTX

30-Second Explanation

RTX is a diversified aerospace and defense company created in 2020 when United Technologies separated Carrier and Otis and combined its aerospace businesses — Collins Aerospace and Pratt & Whitney — with Raytheon Company. [S49][S50]

Collins earns from aircraft equipment and support, Pratt from propulsion and engine services, and Raytheon from defense programs. Their demand cycles and operating obligations differ; the three businesses should not be treated as one uniform manufacturing model.

Financial Snapshot

FY2025 sales were $88.603 billion. [S1][S3]

Collins Aerospace   $30.196B
Pratt & Whitney     $32.916B
Raytheon            $28.043B
Other/eliminations  -$2.552B
----------------------------
RTX consolidated    $88.603B

[S13]

Q3 2026 sales reached $24.965B, up 11% reported and 12% organically. Common-shareowner net income was $2.583B, GAAP EPS was $1.89, adjusted EPS was $2.26, operating cash flow was $2.868B, and free cash flow was $2.119B. [S66][S67]

The adjusted EPS figure includes $0.25 per share from IEEPA tariff-recovery benefits; operating cash flow included approximately $0.3B of recovery. Those items should be identified when comparing the quarter with the underlying run rate. [S66][S67]

Q3 2026 Three-Segment Scorecard

Reportable segmentQ3 2026 segment salesQ3 operating profitSegment marginReported sales growth
Collins Aerospace$8.382B$1.789B21.3%10%
Pratt & Whitney$9.231B$0.608B6.6%10%
Raytheon$8.031B$1.133B14.1%14%
Total segment sales$25.644B$3.530B13.8%—
Eliminations and other($0.679B)$0.110B——
Corporate expenses and unallocated items—($0.026B)——
FAS/CAS operating adjustment—$0.171B——
Acquisition-accounting adjustments—($0.448B)——
RTX consolidated$24.965B$3.337B13.4%11%

Segment sales include intercompany activity; eliminations reconcile them to consolidated sales. Segment operating profit is not the same as consolidated GAAP operating profit because corporate costs, FAS/CAS adjustments and acquisition accounting adjustments are treated separately. [S67]

The portfolio combines commercial aircraft systems, aircraft engines, commercial aftermarket, military propulsion, missiles, air defense and radars. Commercial and defense cycles differ, giving RTX diversification that a pure commercial supplier or pure defense contractor does not have.

Current Segment Leadership

As of the November 3, 2026 research cutoff, RTX is led by Chairman and CEO Christopher Calio. The three business lines are led by Troy Brunk at Collins Aerospace, Shane Eddy at Pratt & Whitney and Phil Jasper at Raytheon. Jill Albertelli has been named to succeed Shane Eddy as Pratt & Whitney president effective January 1, 2027. On the same date, Amy Comer is scheduled to become president of Pratt & Whitney Military Engines, succeeding Albertelli in that role. [S9][S68][S74]

Three Business Lines — Different Customers, Different Economics

1. Collins Aerospace

Collins sells aircraft systems and mission equipment across commercial aviation and defense. Its portfolio includes avionics, communications, navigation, flight controls, landing systems, wheels and brakes, interiors, environmental systems, nacelles, engine components, power and control, and mission systems.

The current perimeter excludes the specified actuation and flight-control business sold on July 21, 2025. That disposal does not mean every retained flight-related electronic or control capability was sold; current ownership must follow the transaction scope rather than an undifferentiated historical catalog. [S67]

Its economic model is certified content per aircraft plus aftermarket. A subsystem selected for a new aircraft can remain in service for decades, creating demand for repair, spare parts, modifications, software and reliability programs. Collins also sells defense mission systems, so it is not purely a commercial-aerospace supplier.

2. Pratt & Whitney

Pratt develops, manufactures and supports commercial and military propulsion systems. Its portfolio includes the GTF family, legacy commercial engines, F135 and other military propulsion programs.

Its economic model is engine platform position plus lifecycle service. Original engine deliveries establish the installed fleet; flight hours, engine removals and maintenance intervals create shop visits, parts and overhaul. The same model creates long-lived obligations: reliability problems, shop-capacity constraints and customer compensation can offset aftermarket demand.

3. Raytheon

Raytheon supplies integrated air and missile defense, precision weapons, naval missiles, radars, sensors, space-related systems and counter-UAS capabilities.

Its economic model is development plus production, replenishment and sustainment. Programs can move from research and development to qualification, production lots, multi-year procurement, international sales and decades of upgrades. Large contract ceilings improve visibility but are not recognized revenue; funding and options still matter.

The three lines share engineering, procurement, manufacturing and capital-allocation capabilities, but they should not be evaluated with one margin or backlog framework.

Products vs Services

RTX's 2025 consolidated sales included $64.171B of products and $24.432B of services. [S13]

Pratt was especially service-heavy: $18.467B products and $14.449B services. Collins reported $21.467B products and $6.118B services. Raytheon reported $24.063B products and $3.829B services. [S13]

These product/service amounts are external sales. Collins' $27.585B external total reconciles to $30.196B of segment sales with $2.611B of inter-segment sales; Raytheon's $27.892B external total reconciles to $28.043B with $0.151B of inter-segment sales. Pratt had no corresponding inter-segment addition in this table. [S1][S13]

Products versus services is an accounting classification, not an exact division between original equipment and commercial aftermarket. Product sales can include spare parts, while service sales can include defense work. The reported services amount should not be relabeled as commercial aftermarket revenue.

In Q3 2026, RTX reported $18.258B of product sales and $6.707B of service sales. For the first nine months of 2026, products were $51.967B and services were $19.782B. [S67]

Backlog

Year-end 2025 backlog was about $268B: Collins $42B, Pratt $151B and Raytheon $75B. [S14]

By September 30, 2026 backlog reached a record $340B, comprising $176B commercial and $164B defense. This compares with $268B at December 31, 2025. [S66][S67]

RTX reported more than $81B of new commercial and defense awards in Q3. Defense bookings were approximately $59B in the quarter and $96B for the first nine months. Backlog is future contractual work and options under the company's definitions; it is not current revenue or an assurance that all headline contract values are funded. [S66][S67]

A large share of Pratt remaining performance obligations relates to long-term commercial engine maintenance contracts that can extend for years. Backlog therefore combines future hardware and future service, not merely factory units waiting for shipment.

Collins Aerospace

Collins supplies avionics, communications, navigation, landing systems, wheels and brakes, interiors, environmental systems, power/control, nacelles, sensors and mission equipment. [S16]

The economic idea is content per aircraft. One Boeing, Airbus, business jet or military aircraft can contain many Collins systems. Each installed component can later create repair, spare, modification and upgrade revenue.

Commercial Aftermarket

In Q3 2026, Collins' organic sales growth included approximately $0.3B of higher commercial aftermarket sales, alongside about $0.4B of higher commercial OEM sales and $0.2B of higher defense sales. The increase was primarily volume-driven across aftermarket channels. [S67]

Service programs can provide guaranteed component availability, repairs, spare pools and reliability upgrades. [S17]

Aftermarket is usually less directly tied to Boeing/Airbus current monthly production than OE because it depends on the worldwide installed fleet and flight hours.

Pratt & Whitney Lifecycle

Pratt commercial engines often have lifecycle economics rather than high initial equipment margins.

engine delivery
↓
installed base
↓
flight hours
↓
shop visit
↓
parts / overhaul
↓
repeat

Pratt supports more than 90,000 in-service engines across its portfolio. [S65] Winning the original aircraft platform can therefore create decades of future service demand.

GTF

The Geared Turbofan uses a reduction gearbox so the fan and low-pressure turbine can rotate at different efficient speeds. [S24]

By July 2026 Pratt reported more than 800 GTF orders and commitments during 2026 and a backlog above 8,000 engines. [S25]

The GTF rebuilt Pratt's new-generation single-aisle installed base. That installed base creates future MRO opportunity — and long-term reliability obligations.

GTF Powder Metal Matter

RTX identified a rare powder-metal condition in certain high-pressure parts that required accelerated inspections/removals for PW1100G-JM engines. [S26]

RTX recorded a $2.9B pre-tax charge in Q3 2023, representing Pratt's 51% program share and expected compensation/maintenance effects. At September 30, 2026, other accrued liabilities related to expected customer compensation were $0.2B; RTX estimated a ~$0.7B 2026 cash impact. Aircraft-on-ground levels for the affected PW1100 GTF-powered A320neo fleet were expected to remain elevated through 2026. The accrual balance, annual cash estimate and original charge are different measures and must not be conflated. [S67]

This is exceptional fleet-management cost, not ordinary profitable aftermarket.

Pratt Q3 Mix and Customer-Bankruptcy Charge

Q3 2026 Pratt sales were $9.231B, up 10%, but segment operating profit was $608M, down 19%, with a 6.6% margin. The organic sales increase was driven by approximately $0.9B of higher commercial aftermarket sales, partly offset by a roughly $0.1B decline in commercial OEM sales due to unfavorable mix on large engine deliveries. Military sales increased slightly. [S67]

Reported profit was affected by an approximately $0.4B customer-bankruptcy charge recorded at Pratt in Q3 2026. This is separate from the GTF Powder Metal Matter. The underlying organic operating-profit bridge also included tariff refunds and higher commercial aerospace profit, partly offset by SG&A. [S66][S67]

This quarter demonstrates why engine-company profitability should not be judged only by new-engine deliveries or aftermarket sales growth.

F135

F135 powers all three F-35 variants and creates production, spares, depot, sustainment and modernization economics.

2026 awards included $6.6B for Lots 18-19 production [S32] and nearly $1.3B for spares/sustainment. [S33]

The Engine Core Upgrade is intended to provide more power and thermal management for Block 4 and beyond while retaining the F135 architecture and support network. Its September 2026 Risk Reduction Design Review was a development milestone, not completed fleet installation. [S34]

Raytheon

Raytheon Q3 2026 sales were $8.031B, up 14%, and segment operating profit was $1.133B, up 32%, with a 14.1% margin. Defense backlog reached approximately $130B as of September 30, 2026. Q3 defense bookings were approximately $52B. [S67]

Sales growth was led by naval power programs, including Standard Missile and Tomahawk; land and air defense systems, including Patriot; and air/space defense programs, including AMRAAM. Strong demand increasingly shifts the bottleneck from customer willingness to qualified industrial production capacity. [S67]

AMRAAM

AMRAAM is used by many fighter aircraft and also serves as a NASAMS ground-based interceptor.

In September 2026 Raytheon received a five-year multi-year contract with two one-year options valued up to $20.7B, supporting a target of at least 1,900 AMRAAM missiles annually under the announced production structure, not a statement that this delivery rate had already been achieved. RTX's Q3 10-Q says the Q3/early-Q4 undefinitized action has a maximum value of up to $20.7B; Raytheon recorded approximately $14.3B of AMRAAM bookings in Q3 2026. [S36][S67]

The maximum contract value is future program value, not current-quarter revenue.

Patriot / LTAMDS

Patriot is an integrated architecture involving radar, command/control, launchers, interceptors and communications. LTAMDS is the next-generation radar intended to improve detection, discrimination and 360-degree coverage. [S41][S42]

A 2025 award valued at $1.7B moved LTAMDS into production for the U.S. and Poland. [S40]

The installed Patriot base creates potential modernization, interceptor and sustainment demand. That opportunity spans multiple suppliers: Lockheed Martin manufactures PAC-3 MSE, so the whole interceptor market cannot be assigned to RTX. [S92]

Standard Missile

The Standard Missile family spans fleet air defense, ballistic-missile defense and multi-mission naval roles. In October 2026 Raytheon received an up-to $6.3B multi-year SM-3 Block IB production/sustainment contract. A separate SM-6 multi-year UCA is valued up to $24.4B, while the seven-year Tomahawk UCA is valued up to approximately $23B. [S38][S67][S70]

The family benefits from Aegis integration, allied demand and replenishment after operational use.

NASAMS

NASAMS combines distributed command, launchers and sensors with missiles such as AMRAAM and AIM-9X. [S44]

Australia declared NASAMS fully operational in September 2026. [S43]

NASAMS is strategically important because it reuses Raytheon interceptor families across a different launch architecture, expanding the economic life of missile technology.

Sensors

Raytheon's missile franchises depend on sensors able to find and classify threats. The portfolio includes LTAMDS, GhostEye-family radars, naval radars and other sensing systems. [S46][S47]

Radar is a platform business: installed arrays can support software upgrades, new modules, sustainment and additional deployments over many years.

Commercial vs Defense Cycles

Commercial demand depends on airline traffic, Boeing/Airbus output and fleet utilization. Defense depends on budgets, geopolitics, replenishment and allied procurement.

The cycles are imperfectly correlated. The 2020 merger closed during the COVID collapse in commercial aviation, immediately illustrating the diversification value of combining commercial aerospace with defense. [S49][S50]

Capacity and Supply Chain

RTX must convert a $340B backlog into physical output. Constraints include castings, forgings, electronics, energetic materials, motors, skilled labor, test capacity and MRO shops. [S66][S67]

The company has been expanding radar, engine/MRO and missile capacity. [S21][S37][S63][S64]

Aerospace capacity is slow to qualify, so long demand visibility can be more important than a one-year order spike.

Contract Accounting

Long-term defense and service contracts can generate Estimate-at-Completion adjustments when expected total cost changes.

expected cost rises
↓
program margin estimate falls
↓
current-period EAC charge

Q3 2026 included $48M of net favorable EAC adjustments, while the first nine months of 2026 included $180M of net unfavorable EAC adjustments. The quarter's improvement does not remove the underlying estimate risk on long-duration programs. [S67]

Backlog quality therefore depends on expected margin as well as headline dollars.

Government Compliance and Contracting Risk

RTX's government business depends on contract eligibility, export-control compliance, pricing discipline and audit readiness. The Q3 2026 Form 10-Q says an independent compliance monitor was engaged in April 2026 under previously disclosed deferred-prosecution and SEC-related obligations. On September 21, 2026, RTX and legacy Raytheon Company entered into a three-year Administrative Agreement with the U.S. Navy's Acquisition Integrity Office. The Navy determined suspension or debarment proceedings were not necessary to protect government interests, and RTX remained eligible to receive U.S. government contracts during the agreement term, subject to cooperation and disclosure obligations. [S67]

This is a material governance and execution topic for the Raytheon business, but it should be described as a compliance obligation and risk factor—not as a statement that RTX is currently suspended or barred from contracting.

Capital Allocation

RTX must fund R&D, commercial engine programs, GTF recovery, MRO capacity, missile factories and shareholder returns simultaneously.

FY2025 free cash flow was $7.9B. [S3] After Q3 2026, RTX raised its full-year outlook to $97.0B–$97.5B adjusted sales, 10%–11% organic sales growth, $7.65–$7.75 adjusted EPS and $9.0B–$9.2B free cash flow. These are management guidance ranges, not actual results. The adjusted EPS outlook includes tariff-recovery benefits. [S66]

High backlog can consume working capital before becoming cash, so execution and capital allocation remain tightly connected.

History

1925:

Frederick Rentschler founded Pratt & Whitney Aircraft. [S23]

2012:

UTC acquired Goodrich.

2018:

UTC acquired Rockwell Collins and created Collins Aerospace by combining it with UTC Aerospace Systems. [S48][S53]

April 3, 2020:

UTC separated Otis/Carrier and merged with Raytheon Company to create Raytheon Technologies. [S49][S50]

2023:

RTX realigned into Collins, Pratt & Whitney and Raytheon, then rebranded as RTX. [S57][S58]

2024–2025:

Christopher Calio became CEO then Chairman. [S7][S8]

2026:

RTX raised outlook, accelerated missile production and continued the GTF fleet-management plan. [S4][S36][S38]

Common Misconceptions

  • RTX is not simply old Raytheon renamed; it includes major UTC aerospace lineages.
  • Pratt does not make money only when an engine is sold; MRO is central.
  • GTF powder-metal removals are exceptional costs, not attractive aftermarket demand.
  • Multi-year missile contract headline values are not current revenue.
  • Patriot is an integrated defense system, not one missile.
  • Collins is much broader than avionics.
  • Collins and Pratt also have meaningful defense businesses.

Related Entities

RTX Economic Flywheel

RTX's strongest businesses follow a recurring pattern:

win platform / program position
↓
build installed base
↓
operate for decades
↓
parts / service / replenishment / upgrades
↓
customer switching cost rises
↓
cash funds next generation

The flywheel looks different by segment, but the logic is similar.

At Collins, the installed asset is an aircraft component or subsystem.

At Pratt, it is an engine fleet.

At Raytheon, it is a fielded weapon or integrated defense architecture.

This is why RTX's strategic focus should be evaluated through installed-base quality and lifecycle economics, not just annual factory revenue.

Commercial OE vs Aftermarket Portfolio Mix

Commercial original equipment is necessary to seed future aftermarket.

A Collins avionics box or Pratt engine that is never selected on a new aircraft cannot generate future service revenue.

But OE can carry:

  • launch discounts;
  • learning-curve cost;
  • ramp inefficiency;
  • customer pricing pressure.

Aftermarket can carry:

  • spare parts;
  • repairs;
  • overhaul;
  • modifications;
  • long-term service agreements.

The strategic target is therefore not maximum OE margin in isolation. It is maximum lifecycle value per installed position.

Defense Program Portfolio

Raytheon contains programs at different maturity stages.

Mature franchises

Patriot, AMRAAM, Standard Missile and established radar families.

Production ramp

Programs with strong demand but constrained factories/suppliers.

Development / modernization

LTAMDS and next-generation upgrades.

A mature production program can generate attractive margins while a development program can record EAC charges.

Segment margin is the sum of these very different program economics.

Backlog Quality

A $1 of Pratt long-term service backlog is not economically identical to $1 of Raytheon missile production backlog.

Backlog quality depends on:

  • contract margin;
  • duration;
  • escalation clauses;
  • customer cancellation/option terms;
  • capacity required;
  • execution risk.

Pratt's service backlog can stretch for many years.

Raytheon munitions backlog may require near-term factory expansion.

Collins backlog may depend on Boeing/Airbus production schedules.

Therefore total backlog is useful for demand visibility but not a single valuation multiple by itself.

Working Capital

Growing factories can consume cash before revenue arrives.

RTX may need to buy:

  • raw material;
  • components;
  • long-lead electronics;
  • energetic materials;
  • engine parts;

months before customer delivery.

A defense production ramp can therefore increase inventory before it increases free cash flow.

The same pattern occurs when Pratt builds spare parts ahead of heavy shop-visit demand.

Supply-Chain Concentration

Aerospace qualification creates supplier concentration.

Replacing a supplier may require:

  • requalification;
  • tooling transfer;
  • material validation;
  • government / airworthiness approval;
  • customer testing.

RTX can reduce risk through second sources and supplier investment, but true dual sourcing is expensive.

This is one reason multi-year defense contracts matter: suppliers are more willing to invest when demand is contractual rather than annual and uncertain.

GTF Recovery Economics

The powder-metal issue creates three simultaneous economic effects.

Direct maintenance cost

Additional inspections and replacement parts.

Customer compensation

Airlines may receive credits or other compensation for aircraft unavailable due to accelerated removals.

Capacity displacement

MRO shops working on powder-metal removals have less capacity for normal revenue-generating shop visits.

The third effect is easy to miss.

A shop can be busy while economics are weaker because extraordinary recovery work displaces ordinary profitable aftermarket.

Commercial Engine Partnership Economics

Pratt does not always own 100% of every commercial engine program.

Collaborator / risk-and-revenue-sharing structures can divide:

  • development cost;
  • manufacturing content;
  • service economics.

The 2023 powder-metal charge was reported at Pratt's 51% share of the PW1100 program. [S26]

This is why program-level ownership matters when translating total fleet impact into RTX financial exposure.

Defense Contract Types

Raytheon contracts can be fixed-price or cost-type.

Fixed-price:

customer price largely set
↓
RTX bears more cost-overrun risk

Cost-type:

allowable cost reimbursed + fee
↓
customer bears more cost uncertainty

Production contracts for mature missiles can be better suited to fixed pricing than first-of-kind development.

A Raytheon backlog dollar should therefore be interpreted with contract type and maturity in mind.

Foreign Military Sales and International Demand

RTX defense exports can flow through different mechanisms.

Some are U.S. Foreign Military Sales.

Others may be direct commercial sales subject to U.S. export approval.

International demand is strategically valuable because it:

  • expands production runs;
  • shares development cost;
  • increases installed-base sustainment.

But political approvals and export controls can delay revenue even after customer interest is clear.

Installed Base Cross-Selling

A single aircraft can carry:

  • Pratt engine;
  • Collins avionics;
  • Collins landing systems;
  • Collins nacelle content;
  • other Collins components.

RTX may therefore earn from several systems on one platform.

The company does not necessarily sell these as one bundled contract, but enterprise scale creates customer and technology relationships across product lines.

Research and Development

Aerospace R&D has very long payback periods.

An engine architecture can take a decade before high-volume service.

A missile seeker or radar technology may transition through government-funded development and testing before production.

RTX must balance:

  • company-funded R&D;
  • customer-funded R&D;
  • near-term production capacity.

Over-investing in current factories can starve future technology.

Over-investing in future technology can leave backlog undelivered.

Capital Returns vs Capacity

RTX returns capital through dividends and share repurchases while also funding production expansion.

When defense demand and commercial aftermarket are both strong, capital competition increases.

Management must decide whether the next dollar has higher value in:

  • a missile factory;
  • an engine MRO shop;
  • R&D;
  • buybacks;
  • debt reduction.

A high backlog does not eliminate this allocation problem.

2026–2027 Enterprise Watchlist

Collins

Can commercial OE growth translate into expanding aftermarket without supplier constraints?

Pratt GTF

Do aircraft-on-ground levels and extraordinary fleet-management cash costs decline as expected after 2026?

Pratt margin

Does higher commercial aftermarket more than offset new-engine ramp cost?

F135

Does ECU advance toward production while sustainment capacity keeps pace with global fleet growth?

Raytheon

Do multi-year AMRAAM/SM agreements improve factory productivity and margin, not just volume?

Backlog

Can the $340B backlog convert without large unfavorable EAC changes?

Supply chain

Do electronics, materials and labor constraints ease enough to support planned rates?

Cash flow

Does free cash flow grow while inventory/capacity investment rises?

Company FAQ

Which RTX business is most profitable?

The answer varies by period and mix. Collins often has strong margins, Raytheon depends on program mix, and Pratt's OE/service mix can move margins significantly. Use segment results rather than a permanent label.

Why does Pratt sometimes lose money or earn little on new engines?

The engine can create decades of future parts and service economics, so manufacturers compete aggressively for installed positions.

Does the powder-metal problem affect all GTFs?

The accelerated inspection program primarily concerns specified affected powder-metal parts/populations; RTX filings should be used for current scope rather than assuming every GTF has the same exposure.

Why are Raytheon multi-year contracts strategically important?

They give RTX and suppliers enough demand visibility to invest in people, machines and materials required for much higher rates.

Why keep Collins, Pratt and Raytheon in one company?

The portfolio diversifies commercial and defense cycles and can share technology/capital, though it also adds organizational complexity.